February 20, 2007
Seabridge Confirms Major New Gold Resource at Mitchell
NI 43-101 Study Infers 13.1 Million Ounces of Gold
Plus 2.23 Billion Pounds of Copper
Porphyry System May Have Significant Expansion Potential
Toronto (Canada) — Seabridge Gold announced today that a National Instrument
43-101 compliant study of its Mitchell gold-copper discovery has confirmed a major new resource which may
have significant expansion potential. The study by Resource Modeling Inc. (“RMI”) of Tucson, Arizona will
be filed on SEDAR within 45 days. The Mitchell porphyry is located on Seabridge’s 100% owned Kerr-Sulphurets
project near Stewart, British Columbia.
At Mitchell, RMI estimates an Inferred Mineral Resource of 564 million tonnes grading 0.72 grams per
tonne gold (13.1 million ounces) and 0.18% copper (2.23 billion pounds) at an equivalent gold cut-off
grade of 0.50 grams per tonne gold. Equivalent grades were determined using a gold price of US$475 per
ounce and a copper price of US$1.50 per pound. The deposit is currently defined by diamond core holes that
were drilled on approximately 200-meter centers. The estimate of Mineral Resources is based on 9,530
meters of core drilling, including 23 holes (7,476 meters) drilled by Seabridge at Mitchell during 2006.
Seabridge President and CEO Rudi Fronk said that “it now appears that Seabridge wholly owns two major
North American gold deposits – Courageous Lake and Mitchell. This year’s programs will focus on advancing
both by updating the Preliminary Assessment at Courageous Lake and continuing to drill at Mitchell to
expand and upgrade the resource, as well as conducting metallurgical studies to determine expected metal
recoveries. We could not be more encouraged by our prospects for value creation in 2007.”
The Mitchell deposit is situated at the base of the Mitchell Glacier within an erosional window through
the major fault complex that crosses the property. The volcanic rocks exposed in the erosional window are
affected by intense phyllic alteration which diminishes to the west. This conspicuous alteration is
characterized by abundant sericite, 5 to 20% pyrite and quartz stockwork veins that locally exceed 80%
of the rock mass. Gold and copper are associated with fine grained sulfide minerals, dominated by
chalcopyrite, disseminated in the rock and stockwork veins. Gold and copper grades in the drill results
are remarkably consistent down hole, along and across strike. This homogeneity of grades and the lack
of sharp grade contrasts across the Mitchell deposit probably resulted from widespread regional
deformation subsequent to mineralization.
RMI constructed a three-dimensional computer block model using MineSight® software. A block size of 25
meters by 25 meters by 15 meters was selected and is thought to be appropriate at this stage of the project.
Several high-grade gold and copper outlier values were cut to 2.5 grams per tonne and 0.80%, respectively
prior to creating 15 meter-long drill hole composites. Grade and indicator variograms were calculated and
interpreted for both gold and copper. RMI notes that gold and copper display exceptionally long ranges but
additional infill drilling will be required in order to evaluate short range grade variability. Block grades
were estimated using several interpolation methods including nearest neighbor, inverse distance squared,
and ordinary kriging. Seabridge geologists constructed a three-dimensional wireframe which represents a zone
of intense sericitic alteration and appears to be one of the primary controls associated with gold and copper
mineralization at Mitchell. This wireframe was used to constrain the estimate of block grades. After visual
and statistical reviews of the estimated block grades, RMI selected the inverse distance squared and ordinary
kriged estimates for the gold and copper grade models, respectively. Block grades that were estimated by two
or more drill holes with at least one hole within 125 meters of the block were classified as Inferred
Mineral Resources. All other estimated blocks remain unclassified at this time. Additional drilling, more
density determinations, updated topography, and ongoing metallurgical testwork will be required to upgrade
the current Inferred Mineral Resources to higher confidence categories. Inferred Mineral Resources for the
Mitchell deposit are summarized in the table below at a variety of gold equivalent cutoff grades.
Mitchell Deposit Inferred Mineral Resources
Gold Equivalent Cut-Off Grade (grams/tonne) |
Tonnes (000s) |
Gold Grade grams/tonne) |
Ounces of Gold (000s) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Pounds of Copper (000s) |
0.25 |
705,349 |
0.62 |
14,060 |
0.156 |
2,417,386 |
0.30 |
661,954 |
0.64 |
13,621 |
0.163 |
2,376,624 |
0.35 |
627,749 |
0.67 |
13,522 |
0.169 |
2,334,064 |
0.40 |
599,799 |
0.69 |
13,306 |
0.173 |
2,292,273 |
0.45 |
580,004 |
0.70 |
13,053 |
0.177 |
2,261,364 |
0.50 |
563,873 |
0.72 |
13,053 |
0.180 |
2,230,783 |
0.55 |
548,045 |
0.73 |
12,863 |
0.182 |
2,200,778 |
0.60 |
534,033 |
0.74 |
12,705 |
0.185 |
2,172,758 |
0.65 |
518,545 |
0.75 |
12,504 |
0.187 |
2,139,459 |
0.70 |
500,979 |
0.76 |
12,241 |
0.190 |
2,097,900 |
0.75 |
479,533 |
0.77 |
11,871 |
0.193 |
2,044,027 |
Note: gold equivalent cut-off grades were calculated using US$475 per ounce gold and US$1.50 per pound copper.
RMI notes that the limits of the Mitchell deposit have not yet been determined and that it appears
to be open up dip (south) and down dip (north) and perhaps to the east with reasonable expectations of
increasing the inventory of Mineral Resources.
RMI reviewed the QA/QC procedures implemented by Seabridge during its 2006 exploration program and
found them to meet industry standards. Seabridge geologists submitted one blank and one standard reference
sample at a frequency of one each per every 35 core samples that were shipped to Ecotech’s prep lab in
Stewart BC. RMI has reviewed the performance of those standard reference samples and has determined that
in general, the performance of the lab is reasonable. 333 Ecotech pulps were shipped to ALS Chemex in
Vancouver and assayed for gold, copper, and other metals. The results from those check assays show that
the Ecotech lab is about 5% higher for gold and about 3% lower for copper than ALS Chemex. RMI has recommended
that Seabridge perform additional check assays from the 2006 drill campaign.
The RMI resource estimate for the Mitchell deposit triggers the vesting of 2.0 million common share
purchase warrants issued to Xstrata plc and exercisable at $13.50 per share for a period of five years.
These warrants complete the agreement whereby Seabridge re-acquired a 100% interest in the Kerr-Sulphurets
project (including the Mitchell deposit) from Xstrata (see news release of September 5, 2006).
Gold resource estimates included herein were prepared by Resource Modeling Inc. under the direction
of Michael Lechner, who is independent of Seabridge and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument
43-101. The independent technical report on the Mitchell deposit will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Exploration activities at Kerr-Sulphurets are being conducted under the supervision of William E. Threlkeld,
Senior Vice President of Seabridge and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.
Seabridge has acquired a 100% interest in nine North American gold resource projects. For a breakdown
of the Company’s mineral resources by project and resource category please
visit the Company’s website at http://www.seabridgegold.net/Resource.htm.
All resource estimates reported by the Company, with
the exceptions of the historic estimates for the Grassy Mountain, and Hog Ranch projects,
and the Kerr and Sulphurets deposits, were calculated in accordance with the Canadian
National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Classification system. These standards differ significantly from the requirements
of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Mineral resources which are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Statements relating to the estimated or expected future production and operating
results and costs and financial condition of Seabridge, planned work at the
Companyês projects and the expected results of such work are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not
historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by words such as
the following: expects, plans, anticipates, believes, intends, estimates, projects,
assumes, potential and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements also
include reference to events or conditions that will, would, may, could or should
occur. Information concerning exploration results and mineral reserve and resource
estimates may also be deemed to be forward-looking statements, as it constitutes a
prediction of what might be found to be present when and if a project is actually
developed. These forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of
estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable at the time they are
made, are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual events or results to differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: uncertainties related
to raising sufficient financing to fund the planned work in a timely manner and on
acceptable terms; changes in planned work resulting from logistical, technical or
other factors; the possibility that results of work will not fulfill projections/expectations
and realize the perceived potential of the Company's projects; uncertainties
involved in the interpretation of drilling results and other tests and the estimation
of gold reserves and resources; risk of accidents, equipment breakdowns and labour
disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of
environmental issues at the Company's projects; the possibility of cost overruns
or unanticipated expenses in work programs; the need to obtain permits and comply
with environmental laws and regulations and other government requirements; fluctuations
in the price of gold and other risks and uncertainties, including those described
in the Company's Annual Information Form filed with SEDAR in Canada
(available at www.sedar.com)
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and in the Company's 20-F filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
available at EDGAR.
Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the
Company's management or its independent professional consultants
on the date the statements are made.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Rudi Fronk,"
President & C.E.O.
For further information please contact:
Rudi P. Fronk, President and C.E.O.
Tel: (416) 367-9292 Fax: (416) 367-2711
Email: info@seabridgegold.net
Back to News Releases
|