|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
September 23, 2003
Seabridge Completes Independent Engineering Study on Red Mountain Gold Project
Report's Preliminary Projections - 8 Year Mine Life with Average Cash Operating
Cost at US$213Per Ounce
Toronto (Canada) — Steffen Robertson and Kirsten
(Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) has completed an Engineering Study dated August, 2003
on Seabridge¬s 100% owned Red Mountain underground gold project located 18km
east of the town of Stewart, B.C. The objectives of the study were to build
on previous project work to identify the best project development approach,
and to assess the current economics of the project. Further on-site work is
in progress to assess alternate tailings disposal options which could reduce
capital costs and improve project economics.
Background
Between 1991 and 1994, previous owner Lac Minerals delineated a
sizeable gold-silver resource through diamond drilling and subsequently
drove a 1700m decline to facilitate drilling, and to obtain a bulk sample.
The project was sold to Royal Oak Mines in 1995, and in the following year
the underground development was extended by 305m and additional surface
and underground drill programs were completed. In 1994, a feasibility study
was partially completed by Rescan Engineering Limited for Lac Minerals.
In 2001, previous owner North American Metals Corp. (“NAMC”) estimated
the mineral resources and undertook limited engineering studies of project
development alternatives. Seabridge acquired the Red Mountain Project from NAMC
in February 2002.
Prior to completing the acquisition of Red Mountain, Seabridge commissioned
D. L. Craig, P. Geol. to perform an independent technical review of the
resource model dated May, 2001, and in the process, satisfied the requirements
under National Instrument 43-101 for public disclosure. Gold resources at
Red Mountain at a zero cut-off grade are estimated as follows:
|
 |
|
Measured |
Indicated |
Inferred |
Tonnes (000¬s) |
Grade (g/T) |
Ounces (000¬s) |
Tonnes (000¬s) |
Grade (g/T) |
Ounces (000¬s) |
Tonnes (000¬s) |
Grade (g/T) |
Ounces (000¬s) |
|
1,257 |
8.01 |
324 |
337 |
7.04 |
76 |
346 |
7.45 |
83 |
|
 |
SRK reviewed previous studies and evaluated the development
alternatives relating to various aspects of the project.
The best development alternatives are:
|
 |
• |
Road access to the site. A road was
designed by NAMC in 2001 to access the project site. |
• |
A seasonal operation from May to
October was selected in favor of year-round operations on the basis
of safety and reliability. |
• |
An on-site mill using a grinding
and cyanidation leaching (CIP) circuit was selected. The alternative
of using flotation to produce a sulphide concentrate for offshore
marketing was discarded on the basis of poor economics caused by
lower overall gold recovery and smelting costs. |
• |
A conventional type of mill was
selected instead of a portable type due to the tonnage required
(1000tpd) and the very fine grind needed. |
• |
The full use of backfill was
selected to optimize the mining recovery of the resources.
Minimizing backfill was considered to reduce costs, but the possible
savings are not enough to justify the lower mining recovery that results. |
|
 |
Based on an initial review of the project economics, SRK utilized a
cutoff grade of 6g/t Au (based on a gold price of US$375/oz) to
delineate contiguous zones of mineralization to assess various mining
and processing scenarios as part of the Engineering study.
SRK decided to include inferred resources in the study because
of their high degree of confidence that additional drilling will
upgrade this material to the indicated category. Resources above the
6 g/t Au cut off grade in all categories (measured, indicated and
inferred) total 1,216.6kt at grades of 9.14g/t gold and 28.7g/t silver.
Tonnes available for extraction shown in the following table were
estimated by a resource conversion process that applied dilution and
mining recoveries to the individual deposits comprising the resources
above the 6.0 g/t cutoff grade. The parameters were based on preliminary
mining designs for different areas of the deposit that included both longhole,
and cut-and-fill mining methods.
|
 |
|
|
|
Tonnes |
Au g/t |
Ag g/t |
|
Mineral Resources (All Categories > 0 g/t Au) |
1,941.2 |
7.74 |
26.2 |
|
Mineral Resources (All Categories > 6 g/t Au) |
1,216.6 |
9.14 |
28.7 |
|
Mining Recovery |
89% |
|
|
|
Recovered Tonnes |
1,081.2 |
9.13 |
28.9 |
|
Dilution Percent |
14% |
|
|
|
Dilution Tonnes |
180.7 |
0.55 |
n/a |
|
Tonnes |
1,261.9 |
7.90 |
24.7 |
|
 |
Project Development Description
The 1000tpd trackless underground mine, assumed to be owner operated,
would be accessed through the existing exploration decline and a new
portal at 1650m elevation. Production tonnes by mining method are planned
at 65% longhole, 29% cut and fill, and 6% development muck. Longhole
stope tonnes vary from 18 to 35kt. Backfill would consist of both cemented
and unconsolidated waste rock, and no development waste rock would remain
on surface at project completion. Mucking to a main muck pass would be
accomplished by 6yd and 4yd scoops. An underground rock breaker would size
the muck to be hauled out of the mine in 20t trucks.
A 1000tpd gold-silver recovery mill would reclaim feed from a run-of-mine
stockpile. The mill process would include a normal two-stage SAG/Ball
mill grinding circuit with high capacity thickening, cyanide leaching,
carbon-in-pulp adsorption, carbon elution and regeneration, electro-winning
and refining, and cyanide destruction with SO2 and air. Metallurgical recoveries
are estimated at 90% for gold and 80% silver.
Mill tailings would be discarded to an earth and rock constructed
tailings dam (with water reclaim facilities) near the mill. The tailings
facility, proposed to be located in the Red Mountain cirque, follows the
design used in the 1994 feasibility study. It is the recommendation of SRK
that a further study be undertaken by Seabridge to assess alternative tailings
facility locations and designs which could materially reduce the capital
cost of the tailings storage facitity.
The project schedule has the new access road opened up for traffic
by the end of the first operating season (mid-May through October).
The pre-production period extends through seasons 2 and 3 with mill
construction, tailings dam construction, and development of the underground
mine. Eight seasons of production (157.5kt/a) follow in seasons 4 to 11.
Mine closure is planned for season 12.
Project Costs
Estimated site operating costs are at Cdn$68.46 per tonne.
Due to the seasonal nature of the project, SRK envisions that it
may be difficult for the owner to fully supply all manpower each
spring through an annual hiring campaign. For this reason, a labour
premium of approximately 14% was added to the operating costs, such
that some funds would be available to utilize contractor supplied
labour as necessary.
Total capital costs are estimated at Cdn$61.8 million, exclusive
of off-site owner¬s costs and working capital. The pre-production
portion of capital is $60.3million. Included in this estimate is $9.2
million for the tailings dam. As indicated above, SRK believes that
further work should be performed on assessing alternate tailings dam
locations and designs which could result in a material decrease in the
capital cost of the tailings facility.
Preliminary Economic Projections
The term “base case” refers to the project as described in this study.
It represents SRK¬s best preliminary estimate of gold production, and
capital and operating costs. The gold price assumption in the model was
varied to determine the “break even” gold price for the project. At a 5%
discount rate, the base case model indicates a break even project is
achieved at a gold price of US$399/oz.
Under SRK¬s base case analysis, life of mine cash operating costs
average US$213 per ounce and total costs, inclusive of capital, average
US$358 per ounce.
Sensitivity analyses were also run for these two scenarios; firstly a
50% increase in mineable tonnage, and secondly cost reductions of 15%
for both capital and operating costs. At a 5% discount rate, the break
even gold price was reduced from US$399/oz to US$350 and US$338 respectively.
In its report, SRK has deemed the exploration potential at the project to be “excellent”.
The calculations taken from the SRK Report use the "All Categories"
resource estimate set out in the table above, which includes inferred resources.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The foregoing economic projections are preliminary in nature, they include inferred
resources that are too speculative geologically (without additional work) to have the
economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral
reserves and there is no certainty that these estimates and assumptions will be realized.
Risks and Opportunities
The main risks associated with the project are related to:
|
 |
• |
The construction and operation of
the mine access road, which must traverse rugged mountainous terrain. |
• |
A lack of continuity in the workforce
due to the seasonal operation. |
• |
Project economics requiring a higher
gold price than currently exists. |
• |
The tailings facility, which must retain
a water cover on the tailings in perpetuity. |
With follow up work, these opportunities
could prove beneficial to the project: |
• |
Exploration to increase the potentially economic mineralization. |
• |
A revised design for the cirque tailings facility to
reduce its capital cost and its long-term costs after closure. |
|
 |
The full SRK report will be posted on SEDAR shortly.
National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure
The SRK Study and the information concerning it contained herein were
prepared under the supervision of Ken Reipas, P.Eng., and employee of
SRK and Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101. SRK
and Mr. Reipas are independent of the Company.
Seabridge has been designed to provide its shareholders
maximum leverage to the price of gold. The Company
has acquired a 100% interest in eight North American
gold projects which collectively contain an estimated
8.74 million ounces of resources in the measured and
indicated categories (250.1 million tonnes grading 1.09
grams of gold per tonne) plus an additional estimated
6.83 million ounces of resources in the inferred category
(201.0 million tonnes grading 1.06 grams of gold per
tonne). (See Gold Resources Table
and press releases dated June 11, 2003, July 18, 2002,
April 17, 2002, April 15, 2002, andJune 14, 2001).
The Company continues to seek expansion of its gold
resource base by acquisition of new projects and exploration
programs largely funded by partners.
All resource estimates reported in this
disclosure are calculated in accordance with the Canadian
National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute
of Mining and Metallurgy Classification system. These
standards differ significantly from the requirements of
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Statements relating to the estimated or expected future
production and operating results and costs and financial
condition of Seabridge, planned work at the Company¬s
projects and the expected results of such work are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements are statements that are not historical facts
and are generally, but not always, identified by words
such as the following: expects, plans, anticipates, believes,
intends, estimates, projects, assumes, potential and similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements also include
reference to events or conditions that will, would, may,
could or should occur. Information concerning exploration
results and mineral reserve and resource estimates may
also be deemed to be forward-looking statements, as it
constitutes a prediction of what might be found to be
present when and if a project is actually developed. These
forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon
a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered
reasonable at the time they are made, are inherently subject
to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause
actual events or results to differ materially from those
reflected in the forward-looking statements, including,
without limitation: uncertainties related to raising sufficient
financing to fund the planned work in a timely manner
and on acceptable terms; changes in planned work resulting
from logistical, technical or other factors; the possibility
that results of work will not fulfill projections/expectations
and realize the perceived potential of the Company¬s projects;
uncertainties involved in the interpretation of drilling
results and other tests and the estimation of gold reserves
and resources; risk of accidents, equipment breakdowns
and labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties
or interruptions; the possibility of environmental issues
at the Company¬s projects; the possibility of cost overruns
or unanticipated expenses in work programs; the need to
obtain permits and comply with environmental laws and
regulations and other government requirements; fluctuations
in the price of gold and other risks and uncertainties,
including those described in the Company¬s Annual Information
Form filed with SEDAR (available at www.sedar.com)
for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Forward-looking statements
are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the
Company¬s management or its independent professional consultants
on the date the statements are made. Seabridge undertakes
no obligation to update these forward-looking statements
if such beliefs, estimates or opinions or other factors
should change.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Rudi Fronk,"
President & C.E.O.
For further information please contact:
Rudi P. Fronk, President and C.E.O.
Tel: (416) 367-9292 Fax: (416) 367-2711
Email: info@seabridgegold.net
Back to News Releases
|
|
|
|